Chapter 4
Nonliquidating Distributions
Dividends - i.e.,
“operating” distributions
See IRC §301(a) - Subchapter C, Part A.
Alternative dividend classification systems:
1) Federal
income tax– income tax; & e&p
2) Financial
accounting – GAAP/SEC rules
3) Regulatory
- utility rate-making
4) State
income taxation/franchise taxation
5) State
corporate law/creditors’ protection rules
Dividend
Payments - Alternatives for Corp.
A. Ordinary course of business
1. cash
2. property – a)
appreciated/depreciated
b) capital
gain/ordinary income property
c) installment
obligations
3. distribution of
corporation's own notes
4. distribution of
corporation's own stock
B. Extraordinary
course of business
Tax Definition of a “Dividend” p.149
§301(c) Income Tax Ordering Rules
1) §301(c)(1)
- dividend distributions.
2) §301(c)(2)
- recovery of tax basis.
3) §301(c)(3)
- realization of capital gain.
§316 - Dividend distribution sourcing:
1) accumulated “earnings & profits,” or
2) current “earnings and profits”
(i.e., the
"nimble dividend" rule).
Dividend Taxation to the Individual
Shareholder p.151
§1(h)(11) - taxation at capital gains rates
(20%) to individual dividend recipient. “Permanent” rate.
Must be “qualified dividend income”, i.e., received from: (1) domestic corporation, or
(2)
foreign corporation (if satisfying specified
criteria). §1(h)(11)(C)(i)(II)
& Notice 2011-64.
Must satisfy a holding period requirement.
“Dividends” from a “money market fund”? Not eligible for 20% rate. Why?
Does the 20% rate incentivize the economy?
Corporate Dividend Policy
p.153
Why pay (or not pay) dividends?
-
Retain earnings for future investments?
-
Reduce borrowing costs through the retention of corporate earnings?
- Pay out earnings for closely held corp.
shareholders but only in a deductible form?
- Any effect on institutional shareholders?
Cf., better use of capital after
distributions have been made to the shareholders?
Defining “Earnings and Profits” for Tax Purposes
P. 155. Code
§312 concerns E&P concepts.
Objective:
Identify a cash equivalent amount available for distribution to
owners/shareholders; premised upon true economic
results, not on the “taxable income” base.
Choices for identifying “dividend” status:
1) Taxable
2) E&P 3) Earned surplus;
income GAAP concepts
(federal tax)
Adjustments to Taxable Income for E&P
Amount
I.
E&P Additions for Income Items (p.156)
- municipal bond income - §103
- life insurance proceeds (above tax basis?)
- federal tax refunds – tax not deductible
II. Deduction
Addback Items to E&P (p.156)
- dividends to the corporate shareholder from another corp.
& previously protected by a dividends received deduction (DRD) for FIT
purposes.
E&P adjustments, continued
III. Nondeductible amounts which do reduce
the E&P amount (p.157)
-
Federal income taxes paid by the corp.
-
Disallowed losses - §265 and §267.
-
Charitable contributions above % limit.
-
Disallowed T& E expense - §274.
These are “cash out of pocket” items but are not
deductible for FIT purposes.
E&P adjustments, continued §312(k)&(n)
IV Timing
Adjustments for E&P (p.157).
A. Income components, e.g., §453 or the (if
available?) “completed contract” method. P.158.
B. Depreciation components,
e.g., §312(k)(3)(A) & §168(g)(2). Use alternative
depreciation system. Also, §179 deduction (amortize over 5
yrs. for E&P).
C. Inventory – FIFO method; not LIFO.
NOTE: (i) No statute of limitations on an E&P determination.
(ii) No PLR re E&P status.
Problem p.158
Income &E&P Determinations
I. Determining
Taxable Income
Gross
income
Sales
(gross) profits 20,000
Dividends from corp. 5,000
Long-term
capital gain 2,500
Total gross income 27,500
Net Income Determination
continued,
p.169
Deductions
Employee
salaries 10,250
DRD - 70%
of $5,000 (§243) 3,500
Depreciation 2,800
LTCL
(limited to gain) 2,500
Total deductions 19,050
Total taxable income 8,450
(27,500
less 19,050)
E&P Determination
Adjustments
Taxable income 8,450
Increases to E&P:
Tax-exempt
interest 3,000
Dividends
received deduction 3,500
Depreciation (2,800 less 1,000) 1,800
(2,000 SL
depreciation x ½
year)
Total increases to E&P 8,300
E&P
Determination
adjustments, cont.
Decreases to E&P Amount
Excess LTCL 2,500
Estimated
federal taxes paid 800
Total decreases (3,300)
Earnings and profits total 13,450
(8,450 + 8,300 less 3,300)
Cash Distributions p.158 Income Tax Effects
1) Cash distribution to the shareholder is a “dividend,”
but the dividend amount (ord. income for FedTax)
is limited to the distributing corporation's “E&P” amount. Code §301.
2) Result to the corporation: Reduction of E&P by the distribution
amount, limited to the amount of E&P (i.e., cannot create a negative amount
in E&P account).
3) What allocation procedures (next slide)?
Allocation Procedures
Rev. Rul. 74-164 p.159
1) Current e&p
is allocated proportionately to all current year distributions.
2) Accumulated e&p
is allocated chronologically to distributions during the year (starting
with the first distribution during the year).
3) Current
loss is allocated pro rata against the accumulated e&p available on the date of the distribution,
unless the date of the loss is specifically earmarked.
Problem (a) p.162
Distribution Exceeding E&P
$10,000 tax basis to Ann for Pelican stock.
Pelican has $5,000 of current e&p
and no accumulated e&p and distributes $17,500.
Result:
a) $5,000
dividend - §301(c)(1)
b) $10,000
return of capital - §301(c)(2); then, zero basis
for the stock.
c) $2,500
capital gain - §301(c)(3).
Pelican's e&p is
reduced to zero - §312(a)(1).
Problem (b) p.163
“Nimble
Dividend”
Rule Effect
$15,000 accumulated deficit in e&p from prior year and $10,000 of current e&p & corp. distributes $10,000 currently.
Result: the entire
$10,000 distribution is a dividend to Ann under the "nimble
dividend" rule (sourced from current e&p).
Pelican continues to have a $15,000 deficit in its e&p (i.e., no adjustments to e&p
account).
No current e&p exists
after the distribution).
Problem (c) Distributions & Mid-Year Stock Partial Sale
Facts: (i) $10,000 of accumulated e&p
before year two (to be allocated chronologically) and (ii) $4,000 of current e&p
(pro-rated allocation).
1) April 1 distribution of $10,000.
2,000 (pro rata portion of 4,000 current
E&P); & then 8,000 of
the 10,000 accumulated E&P (1st come/1st
served) is received as a dividend distribution.
continued
Problem (c) continued
p. 163
2) October 1 distributions of $5,000
& $5,000 to (now) two shareholders.
$2,000 current E&P (1,000 each shareholder).
$2,000
remaining accumulated E&P (10,000 less 8,000 on April 1) allocated
1/2 (1,000) to each shareholder. Each
has a $3,000 capital return (5,000
less 1,000 and less 1,000).
Zero E&P of corp. after these distributions.
Problem (c) continued
p. 163
3) On July 1 shareholder sells 1/2 of stock
for 15k.
What basis, including impact on/of the October
transaction?
a) Original basis of $10,000 & sold
½ equals $5,000
tax basis to this sale.
b) Plus, 1,500 (½ of $3,000 basis return on 10-1)
Equals: 15,000 less 6,500 (5,000 plus 1,500) or
8,500.
Problem (d) p.163
Current Year Deficit
Pelican has a $10,000 deficit in Year Two.
1) April 1 distribution of
$10,000 to Ann
1/4th of current 10,000
loss (2,500) is allocable to the April 1 distribution of 10,000 (no
earmarking);
7,500 dividend
(reducing e&p from prior year to zero)
& 2,500 return of capital to Ann.
Ann’s stock basis is reduced from 10,000 to 7,500.
continued
Problem (d) p.163
Current Year Deficit
2) October distribution of $5,000 to Baker
(No e&p & therefore, no dividend)
Purchase
basis on July 1 15,000
Basis
reduced – 10-1 distribution 5,000
Baker’s
remaining basis 10,000
continued
Problem (d), cont., p.163
Option One (dividends 1st)
2) October 1 distribution of $5,000 to Ann.
No current e&p &
no acc. e&p.
Ann’s results:
Option(s): Basis is: 7,500 3,750
(1/2?)
Less: distribution 5,000 5,000
Result: 2,500 1,250
(basis) (gain)
3) July 1 sale of 1/2 stock for 15k: (a) 11,250 gain (less 3,750 basis) or (b) 13,750
gain (15x less 1/2 of 2,500 or 1,250).
Problem (d), cont., p.163
Option Two (chronological)
2) July 1 - Ann sells 1/2 of stock for 15k.
(15,000 less
3,750 (1/2 basis) = 11,250 gain)
3) October 1 distribution of $5,000 to
Ann.
No current e&p &
no accumulated e&p. Treatment to Ann:
Less:
distribution 5,000
Basis is: 3,750
Result: 1,250 gain
Distributions of Property to
Shareholders p.163
Prior history:
General Utilities doctrine, i.e., no gain recognized when appreciated
property is distributed in non-liquidating distribution.
Not treated as a sale, but certain limitations such
as tax benefit rule and substance over form.
See Code §311(a)(2).
Repealed in TRA-86.
Distributions
of Property to Shareholders, cont. p.163
Income tax issues to the corporation upon a
property distribution:
1) Income (loss?) recognition to the distributing
corporation upon a distribution in
kind? Gain for excess of FMV over
tax basis to be recognized.
§311(b). Cf., §311(a)(2) re no loss
recognition.
2) What effect on E&P from (a) this gain
recognition to the corporation and (b) the distribution event? See §312(b).
Corporate Distributions of its Own
Obligations p.167
Treatment of the corporation:
1) §311(b)(1)(A)
- gain recognition is required by a corporation on the distribution of
appreciated property “other than an obligation of such corporation”.
2) The corporation's e&p is reduced by the principal amount of the
obligation (or, alternatively, the “issue price,” if a lesser value). Code §312(a)(2).
Distributions of Property to
Shareholders p.167
Income tax issues to the shareholder upon a
property distribution:
1) Dividend treatment to the shareholder
receiving the property as a distribution (for the fmv
of property)? Yes, as reduced by any
liabilities (assumed or attached to property).
2) Tax basis to the shareholder for the
property received in the distribution? FMV of property (not
reduced by any assumed/attached debt).
Corporation’s Own Obligations Received
Treatment to Shareholder distributee:
1) dividend to the shareholder for the fair
market value of the obligation received (i.e., not the "face
value" of the instrument).
2) tax basis to the shareholder for the
obligation received as a dividend is the fair market value of that
obligation when received by the shareholder.
Problem (a) p.167
Appreciated Inventory
Zane purchased Sturdley
stock for $8,000.
Sturdley has $25,000 accumulated e&p and no current e&p. Distribution of inventory is made:
$20,000 FMV and $11,000 basis.
1) Sturdley has recognized
ordinary gain of $9,000.
2) $9,000 gain = current e&p
for Sturdley.
3) The entire $20,000 is dividend to Zane.
(9,000
current e&p and 11,000 of acc. e&p.) cont.
Problem (a), continued
p.168
4) Tax basis to Zane for the inventory
received:
$20,000 (FMV) - §301(d). Holding period?
5) Remaining E&P is $14,000:
25,000 prior E&P, plus 9,000 current E&P, less
20,000 distribution, equals
14,000. §312(b)(2).
Not considering the impact of
the federal income tax
liability on the $9,000 gain realized
on the inventory
distribution.
Problem (b) p.168
No Pre-Distribution E&P
Sturdley has no accumulated e&p and no current e&p. Distribution of the appreciated inventory:
$20,000 FMV and $11,000 basis.
1) Distribution produces to the corporation:
$9,000 gain (ord. income)
& $9,000 current e&p (less any income tax on
the $9,000 gain).
2) Result to the shareholder - Distribution
of the $20,000 inventory: 9,000 dividend, 8,000 share tax basis recovery, & 3,000 cap. gain. §301(c).
Problem (c) p.168
Mortgaged Property
Distribution of land: $20,000 FMV; 11,000 basis; subject to 16,000 mortgage debt.
1) $9,000 income is realized
by corporation on the land distribution. §311(b)(1).
2) E&P is increased by 9,000 - §312(b)(1).
3) Distribution to shareholder is $4,000 -
(20,000 FMV less the 16,000 debt). §301(b)(2).
Dividend income is 4,000 - adequate e&p exists.
FMV basis to the shareholder
for the land.
Problem (d) p.168
Depreciated Property
$25,000 acc. e&p and 15,000 current e&p.
Corp. distributes depreciated land with a
20,000 fmv and a 30,000 tax
basis.
1) §311(a) - no recognition of loss
occurs.
2) 20,000 dividend distribution is
made to the shareholder. §301(b)(1).
3) 20,000 tax basis to shareholder - §301(d).
4) E&P is reduced by $30,000 - §312(a)(3)
& 10,000 E&P for the future (25 + 15 less 30 = 10).
Problem
(d), cont. p.168
Alternate: Property Sale
First, a sale of the depreciated property:
10,000 loss reduces corporation’s (1) taxable income
and (2) current E&P (15 less 10 equals 5).
Distribution of 20,000 cash produces 20,000 dividend; acc. E&P is
reduced to 10,000 (25,000 plus 5,000 current less 20,000).
But, shareholder might want the land for other
(e.g., sentimental) reasons.
Problem (e) p.168
Different tax bases
Assume $25,000 acc. e&p
and distribution of used machinery - 10,000 fmv; zero income tax
basis; 2,000 E&P tax basis (five year property and seven year class life).
Purchased for $14,000 on July 1 of year one.
Distribution was made on January 1 of year 7.
Separate depreciation schedules for:
(i) income tax, and (ii)
E&P calculation.
Reg. §1.312-15(d). continued
Problem (e) cont., p.168
Distribution effects
1) 10,000 ordinary income to
Corp. for taxable income purposes - §311(b)(1) & §1245.
2) 8,000 income for e&p
purposes upon the distribution of the asset.
E&P tax basis is 2,000 (14,000 cost less 12,000 depreciation).
3) Distribution of 10,000 to the shareholder.
4) E&P is reduced by 10,000 - §311(a) & (b).
5) Remaining E&P? 25 + 8 less 10 = 23k.
Constructive
Dividends
Reg. §1.301-1(j). p.168
Types of disguised dividend distributions:
1) Excessive compensation paid to shareholders.
2) Personal expense reimbursements.
3) Excessive rent for corp. use of owner’s property.
4) Excessive interest paid on corp. debt, or
interest is paid on debt which really constitutes
equity.
5) Bargain sales of corp. property to shareholders.
6) Interest-free loans made to shareholders. §7872.
Nicholls, North, Buse
Co.
v. Commissioner p.168
Corporate ownership of yacht
and personal use of yacht by a son of the majority owner.
1) Constructive dividend for personal use.
2) Use was imputed to the father (not son).
3) Amount of the dividend (to
father):
a) Not
the purchase price of the yacht.
b) But, value
of the personal use of the yacht for one year.
Constructive Dividends
& 20% Dividends Tax Rate
Taxation of dividends to the
shareholder at the rate of 20% (after ATRA-2012).
Cf., maximum income tax rate of 39.6% for
compensation income received.
Better to have excess compensation treated
as a constructive dividend rather than as compensation?
Consider also the social security tax (12.4% of
$113,700, plus
2.9%) and related considerations for compensation (in lower compensation
ranges).
The Dividends Received Deduction - §243 p.174
Availability of the §243 “dividends received deduction” to the
recipient corporation:
1) 70% - corporate investment
situations;
(10.5% effective tax rate, i.e., 30% x
35%)
2)
80% DRD if 20% to 80% corporate ownership of another corporation’s stock;
3) 100% DRD if the
dividend is paid to an “affiliated group” member (i.e., above 80%).
Anti-Avoidance Limitations
on the DRD p.175
A.
Limits on the §243 “dividends received deduction”: 45 of 91 day holding period
requirement - §246(c)(1)(A). Longer
holding period (90 days of 181 day period) for preferred stock. Objective:
must hold stock & have market risk to enable DRD.
Note re 2003 tax
legislation: separate holding period rule limit (60 days in 120 day period) to
enable the 20% (previously 15%) dividend tax rate provided in §1(h)(11)(B)(iii)(I).
Anti-Avoidance
Limitations
cont. §1059 p.176
B. Treatment
of extraordinary dividends, i.e., “dividend stripping” transactions:
1) tax basis
reduction (for nontaxed portion) and gain recognition after the basis
recovery. §1059.
2) “extraordinary
dividend” occurs when 10% plus of tax basis (or FMV) amount (5% for preferred
stock) is received in an 85 day (or shorter) period.
Note: 2003 tax legislation - extraordinary dividend rule for
individuals. §1(h)(11)(D)(ii).
Anti-Avoidance
Limitations
cont.
p.178
C.
Debt financed portfolio stock limitation on the dividends received
deduction - §246A.
Debt incurred must be attributable to “portfolio
stock” (i.e., less than a 50% interest).
Proportionate disallowance occurs if the
portfolio debt only partially finances the acquisition.
Reduction in DRD is limited to the amount of
interest expense deduction allocable to the dividend. Direct attribution
to debt.
Anti-Avoidance
Limitations
cont.
p.192
D. §301(e) – downward e&p adjustments.
Objective:
To limit the DRD (for 20% plus corporate shareholders), e.g.:
1) when E&P is
increased because of slower depreciation schedules for E&P purposes (than
the usual §167/168 formula), or
2) installment sale recognition for E&P but not for taxable
income purposes.
Problem p.181
DRD Eligibility - 45 day rule
Investor corporation purchases 1,000 shares of
publicly held common stock for $15,000 on June 3, collects $1,000 dividend on
June 10, and sells stock for $14,000 on June 15.
Anticipation:
1,000 dividend & 70% DRD = 300 ordinary dividends, plus 1,000 STCL.
Problem (a): §246(c) results in denial of the DRD.
1) $1,000
of ordinary income, and
2) $1,000 STCL on sale of stock.
Problem p.181
Stock Held Longer
(b) Stock is retained until December 1
(rather than being sold on June 15):
The §246(c) DRD limitation would not apply
since the 45 day minimum holding period requirement
(during the specified 90 day period) has been satisfied in this situation.
Problem p.181, cont.
Dividend Stripping?
(c) Publicly Held pays a second $1 per share
dividend ($1,000) on August 15.
§1059(c)(3) becomes applicable and a $2,000 total
dividend is treated as received.
The total dividends exceed 10 percent of the tax
basis for the stock (since tax basis is $15,000 and the total dividends are
$2,000).
Basis is reduced by the nontaxed
portion of the extraordinary dividend (i.e., by $1,400).
Problem p.181 cont.
Extraordinary Dividend?
(d) Dividends
received total $2 per share but stock is held for 25 months before sold.
Under §1059(a) stock must be held for more than two
years before the dividend announcement date to avoid §1059.
The $2,000 dividend would be an extraordinary
dividend under §1059(c).
Basis is to be reduced by the nontaxed
portion (2,000 less 600 (taxed) = $1,400).
Problem p.181 cont.
Portfolio Debt?
(e) Investor purchases stock for $15,000 by
borrowing $15,000 secured by the stock and paid $1,200 interest expense during
the year and received $1,000 dividends.
Under §246A(d)(3) the $15,000 is “portfolio
indebtedness” with respect to the stock.
Under §246A(a) the §243 deduction is 70 percent of
zero (100% less 100% = 0).
The $1,000 dividend is fully taxable.
Problem p.181 cont.
Partial Portfolio Debt
(f) Investor borrowed only $7,500 of the $15,000
total cost to acquire the stock.
The “average indebtedness percentage" would
then be only 50%. §246A(d).
Under §246A(a) the dividends received deduction is
70% times 50%, or 35%.
Of the $1,000 dividend received the DRD would be
available for 35 percent of the total $1,000 dividend (or $350).
Dividends Paid in Bootstrap Sales p.181
TSN Liquidating Corp. v. U.S., p.181
Assets are distributed by subsidiary to parent corp.
immediately prior to the sale of stock of sub.
Issue: (i) dividend (&
DRD), or
(ii) sale of stock (if
stock sale - §453 installment sales treatment was not then available because of
the applicable 30 percent limit on the initial payment in installment
sales).
Held: DRD is available (dividend before the sale).
Problem, p.193 Dividend
Substance vs. Form
Strap Corp as the sole shareholder of X, Inc.
X stock held more than two years. Therefore, no §1059
applicability.
Strap basis of $150,000 in X stock.
Boot willing to purchase X
stock from Strap for $500,000. X has
$100,000 cash.
X will distribute $100,000 to Strap.
Strap will sell X stock to Boot for $400,000.
continued
Problem, p. 193
Strap would receive a 100% DRD - if the form of the transaction
is respected.
Strap’s LTCG would then be $250,000 (400 less 150
tax basis).
Here: the unwanted asset is fungible cash - and is the
distribution part of the sale?
Stronger step transaction
argument for IRS?
Dividend excluded if a consolidated return.
continued
Problem p.193, cont.
If Strap is an individual: IRS would argue for dividend
treatment since the $100,000 dividend would be treated as ordinary income
(subject to tax at ordinary income tax rate, rather than the 20% rate for
capital gains).
Planning in this context: have the individual redeem $100,000 worth of stock immediately
before the sale to Boot?