GRIEF COUNSELLING
Opinion No. 101 (1987)
QUESTION: Would it be a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct for
a judge to work in conjunction with a professional therapist in group counselling of
persons who have sustained grievous losses in their lives?
ANSWER: The committee has been informed that the classes are scheduled
at such times as to not interfere with the judge's judicial duties and that the judge will
be paid a stipend of $200 monthly, apparently to cover the cost of required insurance. Canon 5A permits a judge to speak and teach on
non-legal subjects in his or her avocational activities provided those activities do not
detract from the dignity of his or her office or interfere with the performance of his or
her judicial duties. Subject to the limitations set out in Canon 5A, the committee is of
the opinion that it would not be a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct for a judge
to work with the described group counselling classes.